From: "Rafal 'Raf256' Maj" <rafal AT raf256 DOT com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: inline
Date: 29 Aug 2002 09:39:03 GMT
Organization: news.onet.pl
Lines: 23
Sender: raf256 AT poczta DOT onet DOT pl@rafal.joint.eu.org
Message-ID: <Xns927975D51B6A0raf256com@213.180.128.20>
References: <Xns927961B9FE2B4raf256com AT 213 DOT 180 DOT 128 DOT 20> <akkmrg$e7h$1 AT nets3 DOT rz DOT RWTH-Aachen DOT DE> <Xns927972F5EFEC9raf256com AT 213 DOT 180 DOT 128 DOT 20>
NNTP-Posting-Host: rafal.joint.eu.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: news.onet.pl 1030613943 7050 62.233.182.179 (29 Aug 2002 09:39:03 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT onet DOT pl
NNTP-Posting-Date: 29 Aug 2002 09:39:03 GMT
User-Agent: Xnews/5.03.24
X-Complains-To: admin AT raf256 DOT com
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

"Rafal 'Raf256' Maj" <rafal AT raf256 DOT com> wrote in 
news:Xns927972F5EFEC9raf256com AT 213 DOT 180 DOT 128 DOT 20

>> Inline requires the code to be in the header.  Right in the class
>> definition itself, actually, if memory serves:

btw. with notation is better (and why)

class cMonoBmp { [...] inline void PutPx(int x, int y, bool c=1); };
void cMonoBmp::PutPx(int x, int y, bool c=1) { [...] }

or

class cMonoBmp { [...] inline void PutPx(int x, int y, bool c=1); };
inline void cMonoBmp::PutPx(int x, int y, bool c=1) { [...] }
^^^^^^

I quess the second with both inline attributes ?


-- 
Rafał 'Raf256' Maj
http://www.raf256.com