From: Martin Str|mberg <ams AT speedy DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Subject: Re: DJGPP r.i.p :( ?
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
References: <1029062722 DOT 562005 AT queeg DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se> <20020811165528 DOT 02547 DOT 00003813 AT mb-cl DOT aol DOT com>
User-Agent: tin/1.4.4-20000803 ("Vet for the Insane") (UNIX) (NetBSD/1.5_BETA (alpha))
Message-ID: <1029165976.153138@queeg.ludd.luth.se>
Cache-Post-Path: queeg.ludd.luth.se!unknown AT speedy DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se
X-Cache: nntpcache 2.4.0b5 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/)
Date: 12 Aug 2002 15:26:16 GMT
Lines: 13
NNTP-Posting-Date: 12 Aug 2002 15:26:16 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: queeg.ludd.luth.se
X-Trace: 1029165976 news.luth.se 439 130.240.16.109
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

AAndrewas <aandrewas AT aol DOT com> wrote:
:>Look. You've been waiting to Allegro to be fixed, right? Nothing yet,
:>right? So it looks like you are the one to change this. Nice to be
:>singled out and know your purpose, isn't it?

: Or perhaps it dosent need to be fixed because it works fine already? 

That's a possibily too: only Raf(sp?)'s setup need fixing?


Right,

						MartinS