From: Cesar Rabak <csrabak AT uol DOT com DOT br>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: RFC: ads on delorie.com
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 20:51:29 -0300
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <3D111901.32F18863@uol.com.br>
References: <200206031429 DOT g53ETT226729 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <3D04D8DA DOT 1EB02473 AT uol DOT com DOT br> <200206101814 DOT g5AIEU819704 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 200-221-14-196.dsl-sp.uol.com.br (200.221.14.196)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1024530829 9913653 200.221.14.196 (16 [39218])
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: pt-BR,es,en
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

DJ Delorie wrote:
> 
> > My humble but sincere two cents,
> 
> Two cents is about a hundred ads at today's rates :(
> 
> (but the types I elect to reject pay about 10x the ones I accept)

I see. . . but consider also the other side: at present exchange rates,
two US cents is a little more than five cents in my country's currency!

Given this information in the relative pay out, I would vote more
strongly on the direction of opening the spectrum of allowed ads.

[]

-- 
Cesar Rabak
GNU/Linux User 52247.
Get counted: http://counter.li.org/