Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2002 16:10:10 +0300
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Message-Id: <2950-Fri07Jun2002161009+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <3d00299c$0$3573$272ea4a1@news.execpc.com>
	(NoEmailAds AT execpc DOT com)
Subject: Re: COFF section flags
References:  <3d00299c$0$3573$272ea4a1 AT news DOT execpc DOT com>
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: NoEmailAds AT execpc DOT com
> Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
> Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2002 03:32:04 GMT
> 
> These are the only COFF section flags that seem to be documented:
> 	0x0020	STYP_TEXT
> 	0x0040	STYP_DATA
> 	0x0080	STYP_BSS
> 
> However, if I use objdump -h, I see what appear to be more
> flag values: CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, DEBUGGING

I suggest to post your question to the Binutils mailing list.

If the additional sections are indeed undocumented, patches to the
Binutils docs will probably be welcome.