Date: Sat, 25 May 2002 17:05:24 +0300
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Message-Id: <8011-Sat25May2002170524+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: emacs 21.2.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
In-reply-to: <3CEF5B9D.B7BCA57@yahoo.com> (message from CBFalconer on Sat, 25
	May 2002 09:45:24 GMT)
Subject: Re: GNU Pascal (gpc) 2.1 released
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1020523191611 DOT 3394B-100000 AT is> <3CED528D DOT 7DCF9660 AT yahoo DOT com> <3CED6BA6 DOT 48D4D0FE AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <ackpus$4e5$1 AT antares DOT lu DOT erisoft DOT se> <200205241404 DOT g4OE4Qt03777 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <3CEE7DCE DOT BD8CACAE AT yahoo DOT com> <2110-Sat25May2002112429+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <3CEF5B9D DOT B7BCA57 AT yahoo DOT com>
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: CBFalconer <cbfalconer AT yahoo DOT com>
> Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
> Date: Sat, 25 May 2002 09:45:24 GMT
> 
> I.E. the original demount I was executing, something like:
> 
>     rm -f @manifest\gcc2953b.mft
>     rm -f @manifest\gpp2953b.mft
> 
> could have been written as:
> 
>     rm -f @manifest\gcc2953b.mft @manifest\gpp2953b.mft

Yes, correct.