From: eplmst AT lu DOT erisoft DOT se (Martin Stromberg)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: GNU Pascal (gpc) 2.1 released
Date: 24 May 2002 13:44:41 GMT
Organization: Ericsson Erisoft AB, Sweden
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <aclg49$c51$1@antares.lu.erisoft.se>
References: <3CED6BA6 DOT 48D4D0FE AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <ackpus$4e5$1 AT antares DOT lu DOT erisoft DOT se> <7458-Fri24May2002135355+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <aclblq$akl$2 AT antares DOT lu DOT erisoft DOT se> <3cee3daf DOT sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lws256.lu.erisoft.se
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Charles Sandmann (sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu) wrote:
: > Ok. But in the case of rm there isn't a legit command-line argument
: > starting with @, is there?

: Sure there is.  try touch @foo, or rm @foo.  It's a legal file name.

Right. It looks like DJGPP need an "rm_pkg" command that verifies the
file exists and do "rm -f @file" internally.

Any better name suggestions for the command?


Right,

						MartinS