X-Authentication-Warning: kendall.sfbr.org: jeffw set sender to jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org using -f
Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 08:40:47 -0500
From: JT Williams <jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org>
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: GNU Pascal (gpc) 2.1 released
Message-ID: <20020524134047.GA22359@kendall.sfbr.org>
Mail-Followup-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1020523191611 DOT 3394B-100000 AT is> <3CED528D DOT 7DCF9660 AT yahoo DOT com> <3CED6BA6 DOT 48D4D0FE AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <ackpus$4e5$1 AT antares DOT lu DOT erisoft DOT se> <7458-Fri24May2002135355+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <aclblq$akl$2 AT antares DOT lu DOT erisoft DOT se>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <aclblq$akl$2@antares.lu.erisoft.se>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

-: : To avoid an annoying warning in case @foo is not a response file at
-: : all, but a legit command-line argument?
-: 
-: Ok. But in the case of rm there isn't a legit command-line argument
-: starting with @, is there?

I'd prefer something altogether more gnuish, like

	rm --files-from=foo.mft
	rm -T foo.mft

instead of the @ usage.