From: Richard Dawe Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: GNU Pascal (gpc) 2.1 released Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 18:32:54 +0100 Lines: 23 Message-ID: <3CED27C6.2AA31B64@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> References: <3CED102B DOT DAD87482 AT yahoo DOT com> NNTP-Posting-Host: modem-164.iodine.dialup.pol.co.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news7.svr.pol.co.uk 1022175302 15011 62.136.44.164 (23 May 2002 17:35:02 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: 23 May 2002 17:35:02 GMT X-Complaints-To: abuse AT theplanet DOT net X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19 i586) X-Accept-Language: de,fr To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Hello. CBFalconer wrote: [snip] > I checked that the appropriate .mft files existed, and that they > contained suitable file lists, yet issuing the rm -f @XXX command > did NOT delete the files. I have also checked that rm IS running > the rm in the DJGPP\BIN directory. I have an alias for rm in the > form "*rm -i", which should not affect anything since the docs say > -f defeats an earlier -i, and I also attempted totally defeating > the alias. Just in case 4dos had anything to do with it I tried > executing the lines through bash, with no change. What happens if you use the '-v' (verbose) option? E.g.: rm -fv @XXX Does 'rm' display anything? Regards, -- Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]