X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
Message-ID: <3C49AFFE.9BE73828@yahoo.com>
From: CBFalconer <cbfalconer AT yahoo DOT com>
Organization: Ched Research
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: True 32-bit OS possible ?
References: <23f2cfa0 DOT 0201181821 DOT 17f380e8 AT posting DOT google DOT com> <3028-Sat19Jan2002111129+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 18
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 17:49:27 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.90.168.83
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT worldnet DOT att DOT net
X-Trace: bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net 1011462567 12.90.168.83 (Sat, 19 Jan 2002 17:49:27 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 17:49:27 GMT
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> > Is there a true 32-bit OS that can execute C programs involving
> > interrupts without using extentions or Protected Mode or any such tricks
> 
> How do you mean: ``32-bit OS [...] without using [...] Protected Mode''?
> 
> Do you mean you want a 32-bit real-mode OS?

Might be possible using unreal mode :-)  I kid you not.  But who
would want to?

-- 
Chuck F (cbfalconer AT yahoo DOT com) (cbfalconer AT XXXXworldnet DOT att DOT net)
   Available for consulting/temporary embedded and systems.
   (Remove "XXXX" from reply address. yahoo works unmodified)
   mailto:uce AT ftc DOT gov  (for spambots to harvest)