X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 14:23:13 -0500
Message-Id: <200112181923.fBIJNDA13044@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <3C1F8F7D.F2F2476C@yahoo.com> (message from CBFalconer on Tue, 18
	Dec 2001 19:10:50 GMT)
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: DJGPP V2.03 Refresh Beta
References: <200112181536 DOT fBIFajg13078 AT delorie DOT com> <3C1F8F7D DOT F2F2476C AT yahoo DOT com>
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> Wouldn't it make more sense to distribute it as DJGPP 2.04 and
> later release the "in-the-works" 2.04 as 2.05?  I hate to see
> modified versions with no obvious markers.  It makes checking
> things by binary identity impossible.

We had a long discussion about this on the workers list.  The result
was that we've been saying "that'll be in 2.04" for too many features
that aren't in the refresh to be able to pull this off.