X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2001 22:26:11 +0200 From: "Eli Zaretskii" Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il To: jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org Message-Id: <557-Tue04Dec2001222610+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> X-Mailer: emacs 21.1.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 CC: djgpp AT delorie DOT com, ST001906 AT HRZ1 DOT HRZ DOT TU-Darmstadt DOT De In-reply-to: <20011204140623.A1031@kendall.sfbr.org> (message from JT Williams on Tue, 4 Dec 2001 14:06:23 -0600) Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: DJGPP port of GNU bison 1.30 uploaded References: <20011129124158 DOT D21756 AT kendall DOT sfbr DOT org>; <20011130140119 DOT C27544 AT kendall DOT sfbr DOT org> <7FB3EF3DFA AT HRZ1 DOT hrz DOT tu-darmstadt DOT de> <20011204140623 DOT A1031 AT kendall DOT sfbr DOT org> Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 14:06:23 -0600 > From: JT Williams > > -: The intention was that the package should be configurable and compilable > -: under plain DOS as well as under Win9X using the provided files in the > -: djgpp subdir (config.bat, config.sed and config.site). > > Is this a general policy for all djgpp ports, or just for bison? This is the recommended policy, yes. (``Recommended'' because the person who does the port is entitled to make the decisions about how does she do it.)