Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 20:03:07 +0300
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: "Luis Filipe Fabiani" <luis2 AT becrev DOT com>
Message-Id: <8296-Tue14Aug2001200307+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <004801c124d1$2763c7e0$0200a8c0@lff> (luis2@becrev.com)
Subject: Re: Problems with compilation
References: <200108140003 DOT UAA12330 AT delorie DOT com> <005601c12455$477bcb80$0200a8c0 AT lff> <001b01c1245f$81ea6600$0200a8c0 AT lff> <997774002 DOT 560704 AT queeg DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se> <004801c124d1$2763c7e0$0200a8c0 AT lff>
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: "Luis Filipe Fabiani" <luis2 AT becrev DOT com>
> Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 11:55:18 -0300
> 
> > Third, how do you deduce that one is right and the other is wrong?
> 
> This is acctually a "translation" to C of a MatLab "program" (.m file). So I
> can compare the results from there....

Then I suspect some uninitialized storage, like an array that is not
zeroed out.  Most (all?) Unix systems return malloc'ed storage that is
zeroed out, while DJGPP does not (for performance reasons).  You can
use the _CRT0_FLAG_FILL_SBRK_MEMORY flag to get the Unix behavior.