From: gautier_niouzes AT hotmail DOT com (Gautier)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: DJGPP limitations ?
Date: 30 Jul 2001 06:33:19 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <17cd177c.0107300533.2e21a48a@posting.google.com>
References: <9k2ap3$6bu$1 AT info DOT cyf-kr DOT edu DOT pl>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 194.40.39.50
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 996499999 30331 127.0.0.1 (30 Jul 2001 13:33:19 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-support AT google DOT com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 30 Jul 2001 13:33:19 GMT
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Rafal Maj (Raf256)" <raf256 AT go2 DOT pl> 

> I think that DJGPP is the best C++ compiler :-) but, is it good for making
> large projects ? Will it be possible to compile such big projects like i.e.
> total of 500,000 lines (about 1 instruction in 1 line) + 50,000 functions +
> 1,000 classes and about 20 MB .EXE file ? I'm asking only for curiosity :-)

I know of a commercial project which made about 20MB .EXEs, more than 500,000
lines compiled with GNAT/DOS (the GNU Ada95 plugged to DJGPP) spread in
about 60 packages; now GNAT for Linux and Windows are used, but it is a detail.

So don't be afraid...

G.