From: pjfarley3 AT escape DOT com (Peter J. Farley III)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Which config.site should be used, bash or autoconf 2.50?
Message-ID: <3b5e4374.33612683@news.escape.com>
References: <CAEGKOHJKAAFPKOCLHDICEMPCFAA DOT tim DOT vanholder AT falconsoft DOT be>
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.21/32.243
Lines: 12
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 22:53:20 CDT
Organization: Giganews.Com - Premium News Outsourcing
X-Trace: sv3-gmR2BTf1p4DMoGfAUbjskWOIIVhuJ63GOfbcThoWGT5wp0lrrHeNp4eEh9lx++loIwpL25no4dYu7Yc!OP9m8YcVhZDEiGTo8CWRirWTgcwqAxrEmHq8o3vTYww4fQQK00IAR0XdEYMi6Ble
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT GigaNews DOT Com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 03:57:54 GMT
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

"Tim Van Holder" <tim DOT vanholder AT falconsoft DOT be> wrote:
>> So we should for now advise people to stay with config.site from Bash,
>> unless they need to run only the scripts generated by the ported
>> Autoconf.  Is that correct?
>
>Yes.

Thanks, Tim and Eli.  I'll try that out and report the results.

----------------------------------------------------
Peter J. Farley III (pjfarley AT nospam DOT dorsai DOT org OR
                     pjfarley3 AT nospam DOT escape DOT com)