From: pjfarley3 AT escape DOT com (Peter J. Farley III)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Which config.site should be used, bash or autoconf 2.50?
Message-ID: <3b5b44b8.11468978@news.escape.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.21/32.243
Lines: 16
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2001 16:25:59 CDT
Organization: Giganews.Com - Premium News Outsourcing
X-Trace: sv3-SksQTvnX23A7/fOQBJD/zlaJc81Brs3MasaaLgRpHTp9Hs8BOIOe7lCnw0gxM2xDlhzlXd5V8ymF9qx!BYT+tN7Odo5cRxgnIYrDE8YYAx/gPcB8r5VqU7WLrE6w5t22WlvNln01DfRNHm8O
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT GigaNews DOT Com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2001 21:30:29 GMT
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Hi all,

I just got back to updating my djgpp installation for a new source
build (awka-0.7.5, to be precise), and dl'ed the latest bash (bsh204b)
and autoconf (acnf250b), and these two both have a file called
share/config.site.  There is some overlap between the two, but which
one should be used?  I will be needing autoconf to update the source
package to build under djgpp, but obviously bash has to work, too.

Any advice on this?  Combine the two?  Which pieces?

TIA for any help or advice you can offer.

----------------------------------------------------
Peter J. Farley III (pjfarley AT nospam DOT dorsai DOT org OR
                     pjfarley3 AT nospam DOT escape DOT com)