Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 10:58:45 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: David Witbrodt <dawitbro AT alpha DOT delta DOT edu>
cc: DJGPP mailing list <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: Re: statfs() mystery deepens -- DJGPP workers exonerated, though!
In-Reply-To: <3B491E33.D4BF2444@alpha.delta.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010709105824.6368I@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Sun, 8 Jul 2001, David Witbrodt wrote:

>   The call to statfs() in printtotals() returns 983040 blocks free,
> while the earlier calls to statfs() back in main() had returned
> 1002802 blocks free, as does statfstest.exe!

Compile statfs with -gstabs+, step into it during each one of these
two calls, and see what's different.  There's no other way to unlock
this riddle.