Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2001 20:27:38 +0300 From: "Eli Zaretskii" Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Message-Id: <2593-Wed04Jul2001202738+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 In-reply-to: <3b434859.81153395@news.primus.ca> (invalid@erehwon.invalid) Subject: Re: Strange behavior of compiler. References: <3b3b4af5 DOT 212572777 AT news DOT primus DOT ca> <4331-Thu28Jun2001221650+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <3b3bea8a DOT 253431390 AT news DOT primus DOT ca> <9791-Fri29Jun2001121247+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <3b3d91ea DOT 361831744 AT news DOT primus DOT ca> <4634-Sat30Jun2001162910+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <3b434859 DOT 81153395 AT news DOT primus DOT ca> Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > From: invalid AT erehwon DOT invalid (Graaagh the Mighty) > Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp > Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2001 16:46:55 GMT > > On Sat, 30 Jun 2001 16:29:10 +0300, "Eli Zaretskii" > sat on a tribble, which squeaked: > > >> From: invalid AT erehwon DOT invalid (Graaagh the Mighty) > >> Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp > >> Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 08:47:12 GMT > >> > >> Yeah, and I seem to recall that stabs debug info kept causing that > >> overflow, or something of the sort. > > > >No, stabs debug info never caused any overflow. > > Well, what is it then that I remember from a year or so ago? There was > *some* objection to stabs debugging, that I remember. Perhaps that symify doesn't know about stabs. And there was never any objections to stabs debugging per se, just to making it the default (i.e. the one activated with -g as opposed to -gstabs).