Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2001 23:03:23 +0300 From: "Eli Zaretskii" Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il To: Jason Hood Message-Id: <9743-Mon02Jul2001230323+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 CC: djgpp AT delorie DOT com In-reply-to: <3B409CC8.198848AD@postmark.net> (message from Jason Hood on Tue, 03 Jul 2001 02:09:44 +1000) Subject: Re: Man program References: <3B409CC8 DOT 198848AD AT postmark DOT net> Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > From: Jason Hood > Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp > Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2001 02:09:44 +1000 > > After having installed GLOBAL, I was wondering if 'man' should use > 'mandoc' as default instead of 'man'? I don't think so. Why would we need that? You can always run Groff with whatever switches you want, can't you? In any case, GLOBAL should come with formatted man pages, so you shouldn't worry about mandoc. > If so, I'd be willing to make the change and upload the new version. I'm still maintaining `man', so if you want to suggest changes, please send the diffs to me, or post them here. > While I'm at it, I'll change 'manpath' to use "/dev/env/DJDIR" > instead of "c:/djgpp". What for? DJGPP.ENV already does set MANPATH to the equivalent of "/dev/env/DJDIR", and without DJGPP.ENV /dev/env/DJDIR will not work anyway. The default value encoded in the source is a fallback, for the case that DJGPP is not installed, and somebody uses `man' as an isolated utility. In that case, /dev/env/DJDIR won't work.