From: "Giovanni Ceglia" <giovanniceglia AT inwind DOT it>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Problem with djgpp installation.
Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 15:14:13 +0200
Organization: Wind Telecomunicazioni S.p.A.
Lines: 58
Message-ID: <9e5s47$eek$1@nreadA.inwind.it>
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1010507091338 DOT 19812F AT is>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.98.182.9
X-Trace: nreadA.inwind.it 990278599 14804 62.98.182.9 (19 May 2001 13:23:19 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT inwind DOT it
NNTP-Posting-Date: 19 May 2001 13:23:19 GMT
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

I tryed to install djgpp on my computer.

I use Win95 on a pentium 166 mmx with 32 megabytes of RAM.

I run all the steps into readme.1st

I unzipped files
I controlled there was directory and long file name
ecc. ecc..

But i run gcc trying to compile a program, veri simplex program.

<prova.c>

int main()
 {
   return 0;
 }

with

gcc -c -Wall prova.c

and i obtain alwais this erro:

gcc.exe: installation problem, cannot execute 'as': no such name or
directory (ENOENT)

can anyone help me, what depend of?

I installed also DevCpp who use djgpp and DevCpp run perfectly with no
problems.



Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> wrote in message
Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1010507091338 DOT 19812F AT is...
>
> On Sun, 6 May 2001, Alexei A. Frounze wrote:
>
> > with AT&T you need to have those b/w/l everytime, even when obvious "mov
ax,
> > 1" is considered, it would be "movw $1, %ax".
>
> I don't think this is true anymore, at least not everywhere.  Did you
> try Gas from Binutils 2.11?
>
> > > You can tell the compiler exactly what register it clobbers
> > > e. g.. m not good at bcc
> >
> > Yes, this is nice and may be useful for the optimizer, though if you
know
> > what bcc expects to be preserved, you will do fine too.
>
> I don't think you can know that, since it is not documented anywhere
> (AFAIK).