From: rpolzer AT durchnull DOT de (echo 'Rudolf Polzer'>/dev/null) Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: Small footprint compiler References: X-newsgroup: comp.os.msdos.djgpp X-realname: Eli Zaretskii X-Ringtones: http://ringtones AT durchnull DOT de X-Original: no Message-ID: User-Agent: slrn/0.9.6.3 (Linux) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2001 10:47:32 +0200 Lines: 33 NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.7.24.124 X-Trace: 987929478 news.freenet.de 12147 213.7.24.124 X-Complaints-To: abuse AT freenet DOT de To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > On Fri, 20 Apr 2001 rpolzer AT www42 DOT t-offline DOT de wrote: > > > W.Gwinn wrote: > > > Does anyone have any recommendation for a C/C++ compiler with a minimal > > > footprint? editing to be done in Edit, on an old 40mb Laptop. > > > speed not a real issue > > > > No, DJGPP seems not to be suitable for this. > > Why not? 40MB is not something you cannot install and use DJGPP on. > > Is that 40MB disk space or memory size, btw? If that's the disk size, > what is the size of physically installed memory on that system? I thought about this: Some time ago, I had a 40MB 286 with 1 MB RAM (and Hercules gfx). On this one, DJGPP did not run because of the RAM and the 286. The successor was a 50MB 386SX16 with 1 MB RAM, and now the RAM is the problem. But with 4M it _may_ work - at least if cwsdpmi supports swapping (AFAIK it does). > > But - there is no real C++ compiler for such machines. > > DJGPP is such a compiler. I was still thinking of a 286. -- #!/usr/bin/perl -W -- WARNING: This will print 22,307 bytes! use strict;for(my$y=-1;$y<1;$y+=.1){for(my$x=-1.9;$x<.4;$x+=.03){print'+'; my$X=my$Y=0;for(0..99){($X,$Y)=($X*$X-$Y*$Y+$x,2*$X*$Y+$y);print"\b "if$X* $X+$Y*$Y>9;}}print"\n"};print''.reverse"\nHPAJ \a!rezloP .R yb torblednaM"