Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 13:05:12 -0600
From: Carl and Dasha Rasnic <carlicek AT swbell DOT net>
Subject: Help
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Message-id: <000901c0b170$b0be7820$4796fea9@computer>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
References: <3ab79085 DOT 17ef DOT 0 AT surfeu DOT fi>
X-Priority: 3
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

How do I get off this message board?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mr. Veli Suorsa" <VJSuorsa AT Surfeu DOT Fi>
To: <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Cc: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>; "Mr. Veli Suorsa"
<VJSuorsa AT Surfeu DOT Fi>
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 11:16 AM
Subject: Re: Can you combine DOC- subdirectories


> Thanks for your reply!
>
> >On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Mr. Veli Suorsa wrote:
> >
> >> >> >> Directory of C:\DJGPP\GNUDOCS
> >> >> >> GCC-2    952 <DIR>
> >> >> >> - Why g77 / f77 documentation is here?
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Because g77 is part of the GCC package.
> >> >>
> >> >> Should directory's name be C:\DJGPP\GNUDOCS\G77 ?
> >> >
> >> >No, I don't think so.
> >>
> >> Why not?
> >> There were only 20 files about Fortran 77 docs.
> >
> >Again, Fortran 77 is part of the GCC distribution.
>
> Yes, but.
>
> >So their docs should be together, in order to allow them
> >to be updated simultaneously.
>
> Yes, but in that directory wasn't nothing else together (only F77 docs).
That
> is why I suggest subdirectory \G77\ or \F77\.
>
> By the way, where are F90 or F95 or F00 docs and download sites?
>
> >> >> So many stars-lines from start page and not even
> >> >> alphapetical order!
> >> >
> >> >They are in the logical order: the Info system itself
> >> >first (so that you could use Info), then the compiler,
> >> >the library, and the basic development tools such as the
> >> >debugger, then the utilities.
> >>
> >> You can do better, I suppose.
> >
> >Please suggest a better order.  The current order was the
> >best we could think of.  I think it is better than the
> >alphabetical order.
>
> I agree with you.
>
> First in the logical order and then the alphabetical order. It is easier
to
> read and find info this way. But you had to correct many info- pages,
because
> they are not conform to each other.
>
> >People don't really have to read all that list, or search
> >it for certain entries.  Typing "m emacs RET" will get you
> >to the Emacs manual from anywhere in the menu.  So the
> >order is less important than you seem to think.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Veli Suorsa
> ---
> "People must believe to the future to be able to live!"
> ---------------------------------- J.V.Snellman, 1890.
>
> Oulu, FINLAND
> Mailto:VJSuorsa AT Surfeu DOT Fi
> http://members.surfeu.fi/veli.suorsa/
> http://www.surfeu.fi