From: damon AT WRONG DOT redshift DOT com (Damon Casale) Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: GPROF reports zero time spent? Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 23:28:27 GMT Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com Message-ID: <3ab2a100.659119@news.redshift.com> References: <3aa69f21 DOT 386105 AT news DOT redshift DOT com> <9867vf$9ts$1 AT nets3 DOT rz DOT RWTH-Aachen DOT DE> <3aa6b9b7 DOT 800087 AT news DOT redshift DOT com> <7263-Thu08Mar2001090237+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <3aa7c5f5 DOT 208835 AT news DOT redshift DOT com> <7704-Sat10Mar2001195349+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.21/32.243 X-Complaints-To: newsabuse AT supernews DOT com Lines: 31 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com On Sat, 10 Mar 2001 19:53:49 +0200, "Eli Zaretskii" wrote: >> From: damon AT WRONG DOT redshift DOT com (Damon Casale) >> Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp >> Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2001 17:59:12 GMT >> >> >> >> Hmm. Apparently, I already have DJGPP v2.03. >> > >> >Are you sure? The above output surely look amazingly similar to the >> >problem with v2.02 library described in the FAQ. How did you check >> >that you have v2.03? >> >> I checked my install directory. I have the BinUtils 2.9.5.1 (or >> however you arrange the dots) zip file there. I checked the date/time >> stamp of gprof in the zip file and compared it with the gprof on my >> test machine. Same date/time stamp, same file size. > >Gprof is not the problem: the bug described in the FAQ was in the >DJGPP library, and it affected the profiled code, not Gprof itself. >That is, the profiled code would report bogus profile data. Errr...wouldn't it cause a problem if gprof was compiled with the earlier library? Oh, and I never had v2.02, apparently. I started using DJGPP after v2.03 came out. Damon Casale, damon AT WRONG DOT redshift DOT com (remove the obvious) A little ad lib(c) wouldn't hurt, would it?