Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2001 14:02:25 -0700
From: Bill Currie <bill AT taniwha DOT org>
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: bash 2.04
Message-ID: <20010106140225.A17172@taniwha.org>
Mail-Followup-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
References: <Xns9020DCBDF386sxmydejacom AT 130 DOT 133 DOT 1 DOT 4> <9743-Sat06Jan2001123641+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i
In-Reply-To: <9743-Sat06Jan2001123641+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>; from eliz@is.elta.co.il on Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 12:36:42PM +0200
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 12:36:42PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> The library (and thus Bash) does make exception for the DOS standard
> extensions .exe, .com, .bat, and .btm, but only because the stock
> shells behave like that.

Hmm, I'm out of touch. What's .btm?

Bill
-- 
Leave others their otherness. -- Aratak