From: dontmailme AT iname DOT com (Steamer)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: DJGPP Developement
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 17:57:13 GMT
Organization: always disorganized
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <3a4b7e0c.9427917@news.freeserve.net>
References: <PAw26.163808$_5 DOT 36727858 AT news4 DOT rdc1 DOT on DOT home DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: modem-181.bar-goby.dialup.pol.co.uk
X-Trace: news7.svr.pol.co.uk 978026233 20435 62.136.228.181 (28 Dec 2000 17:57:13 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: 28 Dec 2000 17:57:13 GMT
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT theplanet DOT net
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.11/32.235
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Krull wrote:

> I've been using DJGPP forever, and I can't remember the last time I
> downloaded a new version.

Earlier this year, I should think.  Unless you're still using an
old version.

> I found that it still uses <limits.h> instead of
> the more modern <limits>.

C and C++ both require <limits.h>.  C++ also requires <limits>, but
this is a GCC issue, not a DJGPP issue.  The GCC web site says that
GCC 3.0 should be out by the end of the first quarter of 2001.
But a few days ago it was saying "end of 2000" - so don't put too
much faith in their planned release dates.