From: "Gregg T. Geiger" <gt DOT geiger AT worldnet DOT att DOT net>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
References: <PAw26.163808$_5 DOT 36727858 AT news4 DOT rdc1 DOT on DOT home DOT com>
Subject: Re: DJGPP Developement
Lines: 24
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Message-ID: <NdH26.7955$bU.573105@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 13:28:13 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.75.135.151
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT worldnet DOT att DOT net
X-Trace: bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net 978010093 12.75.135.151 (Thu, 28 Dec 2000 13:28:13 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 13:28:13 GMT
Organization: AT&T Worldnet
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

The issue of updating the Standard Library headers, and <limits> in
particular,
has been posted as far back as 1998 by my recollection.  I'm afraid the
GNU/DJGPP compiler is becoming rather obsolete as more and more
developers strive to write Standard-compliant code.

"Krull" <krull911 AT usa DOT net> wrote in message
news:PAw26.163808$_5 DOT 36727858 AT news4 DOT rdc1 DOT on DOT home DOT com...
> Hey, I'm just wondering what's up with DJGPP's developement?  Is it still
> being developed, or are they sort of holding around their current version?
>
> I've been using DJGPP forever, and I can't remember the last time I
> downloaded a new version.  I found that it still uses <limits.h> instead
of
> the more modern <limits>.  So I went to their website
> (http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/) and noticed that the downloads were the
same
> ones I already have, and that their web site hasn't had any (obvious)
> updates in a while.  So I'm wondering, are they still putting out new
> versions or what?
>
>