Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2000 00:38:30 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: "Charles Sandmann" <sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
Message-Id: <4331-Sat21Oct2000003828+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.5h
CC: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <39f05a6b.sandmann@clio.rice.edu>
Subject: Re: Announce: CWSDPMI r5 public beta
References: <8sq0ld$208k$1 AT news DOT itfs DOT nsk DOT su> <39f05a6b DOT sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: "Charles Sandmann" <sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
> Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
> Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 14:44:59
> 
> I'd still like to hear comments from users on what to do about this.
> For example, the current beta configuration would prevent someone 
> with a 512Mb machine from running nested DJGPP applications without
> modifying CWSDPMI with CWSPARAM.

How about a default that would leave enough DOS memory for some
reasonable number of nested DJGPP programs (2? 3?), in addition to a
CWSPARAM parameter that controls how much DOS memory can be used?