Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 09:43:05 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Message-Id: <3791-Wed18Oct2000094304+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.5h
In-reply-to: <tf4qusk3quottc52jj9cmuhmqlvk48cgm7@4ax.com> (message from Damian
	Yerrick on Wed, 18 Oct 2000 03:02:12 GMT)
Subject: Re: qsort's algorithm
References:  <tf4qusk3quottc52jj9cmuhmqlvk48cgm7 AT 4ax DOT com>
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: Damian Yerrick <Bullcr_pd_yerrick AT hotmail DOT comRemoveBullcr_p>
> Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
> Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 03:02:12 GMT
> 
> Does DJGPP libc's qsort() have bad performance on already sorted
> data?

No, DJGPP's qsort should perform very well on sorted data.  If you
find otherwise, please report that (together with the data).