From: Martin Stromberg Message-Id: <200009271118.NAA05503@lws256.lu.erisoft.se> Subject: Re: Building binutils 2.95.1 To: tim DOT vanholder AT falconsoft DOT be (Tim Van Holder) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 13:18:06 +0200 (MET DST) Cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com In-Reply-To: <200009271057.MAA05457@bashir.belgium.eu.net> from "Tim Van Holder" at Sep 27, 2000 12:57:01 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > Obviously drunk, "Martin Stromberg" wrote about Uhh!? > The -1 suggests that command.com is being used as shell and asked > to invoke something it doesn't know about. > The fact that it's the config.h rule suggests something like this: > > config.h: blah blah > @true The exact line is "config.h: stamp-h ; @true" > command.com doesn't have a 'true' command, so it barfs. > > The solution will likely be to put either > SHELL = /bin/sh > in the offending Makefile, or (preferably) in Makefile.in (so it stays > set if you reconfigure). > For recent autoconfs (2.13 is new enough, I think), you can > put > SHELL = @SHELL@ > in Makefile.in instead. But there already is a line that says "SHELL = sh" in the makefiles. And "type -p sh" in bash points out sh.exe in djgpp/bin. Right, MartinS