From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
To: clc5q AT cobra DOT cs DOT Virginia DOT EDU (Clark L. Coleman)
Cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <8q8vpi$c9e$1@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
	(clc5q AT cobra DOT cs DOT Virginia DOT EDU)
Subject: Re: missing cc1plus.exe file
References: <_spx5.40284$XZ4 DOT 513027 AT news DOT infostrada DOT it> <8q8mfm$8oi$1 AT murdoch DOT acc DOT Virginia DOT EDU> <6ntfssgr3sfbc8bb8e473oothqqku47uln AT 4ax DOT com> <8q8vpi$c9e$1 AT murdoch DOT acc DOT Virginia DOT EDU>
Message-Id: <20000923231923.687C023146@titan.progiciels-bpi.ca>
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2000 19:19:23 -0400 (EDT)
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: clc5q AT cobra DOT cs DOT Virginia DOT EDU (Clark L. Coleman)
> Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
> Date: 20 Sep 2000 00:18:58 GMT
> 
> Now, the problem is that:
> 
> gcc -c -g -o foo.o foo.c
> 
> (this is executed from a makefile)
> 
> produces object file FOO.O instead of foo.o. The make terminates,
> probably because it detects the fact that it failed to produce the
> target 'foo.o'.

This should never happen with the DJGPP port of Make.  Are you sure
you are not using some other port of the Make utility?