From: "Rafał Maj" Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Odp: Warning : if (x=y) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2000 13:36:44 +0200 Organization: Academic Computer Center CYFRONET AGH Lines: 36 Message-ID: <8pfrln$mbq$1@info.cyf-kr.edu.pl> References: <8pd7q6$ljs$2 AT info DOT cyf-kr DOT edu DOT pl> <8pdc2s$1b6$2 AT news DOT luth DOT se> NNTP-Posting-Host: d-94-53-16.cyfronet.krakow.pl X-Trace: info.cyf-kr.edu.pl 968585719 22906 149.156.1.176 (10 Sep 2000 11:35:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news AT cyf-kr DOT edu DOT pl NNTP-Posting-Date: 10 Sep 2000 11:35:19 GMT X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com AndrewJ wrote : > On 9 Sep 2000 12:57:00 GMT, Martin Str|mberg wrote: > > >: I have use Turbo Pascal for over 6 years, so now in C++ I'm often writing > > Hahahahahahahaha.... sorry... Pascal... hahahahaha... > 1) In Poland (country in central Europ ;) ) Turbo Pascal is used in all schools for lerning programming. 2) 6 years ago, on my 286 16 Hz it was quite difficult to compile anything in C++ ;) 3) Turbo Pascal works now on my 525 Celeron faster ten C++... 2000 lines program will compile and build in about 0.5 s in TP, and about 6 s in C++. When you compile program often, this difference is important. But I agree that it's imposible to write bigger programs in TP, especialy in standart (not Borland) version, with 64 Kb code segment limit. Ofcourse, C is much more flexible, portable, etc... IMHO isn't so bad after all. It's useful for writting _small_ programs, and maybe for testing algoritms. After 6 years of using TP now it is something like... old friend maybe ? ;) Meany techers in AGH high-school (informatics, robotics etc...) still writes their programs in... Basic (normal, not Visual) :))) ================= P.S. in what language was Windows 95 written ? I think that most in C / C++, right ?