From: eglebbk AT dds DOT nl (Evert Glebbeek) Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: The Future of DJGPP Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2000 22:48:31 GMT Organization: Physics student, University of Amsterdam Lines: 26 Distribution: world Message-ID: <39b6bafd.13383847@news.wins.uva.nl> References: <967904615 DOT 832712 AT shelley DOT paradise DOT net DOT nz> <39B16ACD DOT F45CD739 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <39B3E6A2 DOT 19C880E9 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <39B5676C DOT 5C9B914 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: stol-117-201.uva.studentennet.nl X-Trace: info.wins.uva.nl 968453362 19423 145.98.117.201 (8 Sep 2000 22:49:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet AT science DOT uva DOT nl NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2000 22:49:22 +0000 (UTC) X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.11/32.235 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Newsgroup: comp.os.msdos.djgpp From: Damian Yerrick On Wed, 06 Sep 2000 02:22:13 GMT >On Tue, 05 Sep 2000 22:36:44 +0100, Richard Dawe > wrote: > >>Damian Yerrick wrote: >>> >>> Richard Dawe wrote: >>> >>> >As you say, it giveth with one hand (LFN) and taketh with the other >>> >(nested exec). Maybe this problem will be cracked one day? >>> >>> It'll be cracked for purposes of running make -> gcc -> cpp as soon >>> as someone builds a Cygwin or MinGW hosted cross-DJGPP. >> >>Perhaps it would be beneficial to make DJGPP interoperate with these >>programs better for the future? > >If nobody builds a Cygwin hosted DJGPP (like the Linux hosted DJGPP), >we'll have to figure out how to use Cygwin make to call gcc using, >say, a response file to pass >126 character command lines. How about using the version of make distributed with MinGW? Or are there problems I'm not aware of?