Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 19:39:44 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Message-Id: <5137-Fri25Aug2000193943+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.2.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.5b
In-reply-to: <llpcqsk25p2d7vkam96fljcorr1k3jva79@4ax.com> (message from
	AndrewJ on Fri, 25 Aug 2000 12:31:24 GMT)
Subject: Re: Watcom C++ opened?
References: <uuo5qsg1nj0uisvlj8dbum16k9r0cvv4ae AT 4ax DOT com> <200008222126 DOT RAA23165 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <mucaqs0p06etnaldu00atmcnbci1o5tsoa AT 4ax DOT com> <7458-Fri25Aug2000105450+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <llpcqsk25p2d7vkam96fljcorr1k3jva79 AT 4ax DOT com>
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: AndrewJ <luminous-is AT REMOVE DOT home DOT com>
> Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
> Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 12:31:24 GMT
>
> >The "mine's bigger" part is _your_ interpretation, DJ didn't say that.
> 
> I was thinking more in terms of two folks, both advocating opposing products.

But that's not the case, you see.  DJ simply got the facts right.  Not
everything people say they say for the sake of the argument, to
advicate their own point of view.  Sometimes they just convey useful
information.

> But I am curious, how is asserting that a product has /more/ lines of code
> making a case for it?

I don't think DJ was making a case here.