From: Hans-Bernhard Broeker Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: where is __FILE__/__DATE__ ? Date: 18 Aug 2000 11:14:33 GMT Organization: Aachen University of Technology (RWTH) Lines: 29 Message-ID: <8nj5qp$blo$1@nets3.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE> References: <1u6ops46pog5cggn1o102tlig0msdqkmeo AT 4ax DOT com> NNTP-Posting-Host: acp3bf.physik.rwth-aachen.de X-Trace: nets3.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE 966597273 11960 137.226.32.75 (18 Aug 2000 11:14:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse AT rwth-aachen DOT de NNTP-Posting-Date: 18 Aug 2000 11:14:33 GMT Originator: broeker@ To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Radical NetSurfer wrote: > On Wed, 16 Aug 2000 12:36:42 -0400, Radical NetSurfer > wrote: >>Does DJGPP suppport __FILE__, __DATE__, __LINE__, etc? > I still have NO CLUE how to get these to display during compile > times. Why should they? What good would it do you? A compiler is for compiling programs, not for organizing your project management. That's what 'make' and other tools are for. > I think it rediculuous that #message does not exist, or that > #warning does not expand macro's. If you *really* want it that badly, you're always free to add support for this to GNU cpp yourself. You have the source, and the rights to do it. Nothing gets done by complaining, but only by someone actually *doing* it. > Thats why people use Borland, etc. Sorry, but that's simply nonsense. People use Borland mainly because they're used to it, or because they like its IDE better than MSVC. -- Hans-Bernhard Broeker (broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de) Even if all the snow were burnt, ashes would remain.