Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 08:28:21 +0200 From: "Eli Zaretskii" Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Message-Id: <2110-Thu17Aug2000082820+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.2.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.5b In-reply-to: <399a9c89.5408648@news.telepath.com> (remove DOT this DOT part DOT AND DOT the DOT underscore_hacker DOT jack AT juno DOT com) Subject: Re: X-DOS: anybody knows about it? (small free DOS) References: <3988750B DOT 3823E163 AT inti DOT gov DOT ar> <399a9c89 DOT 5408648 AT news DOT telepath DOT com> Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > From: remove DOT this DOT part DOT AND DOT the DOT underscore_hacker DOT jack AT juno DOT com (Kurt McKee) > Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp > Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 03:13:33 GMT > > As far as I know, you will never find a DOS of any sort that > implements '.' or '..' Actually, some network redirectors do implement these. I think some of the CD-ROM formats also have these in the root directory. > you'll never find '..' on the root since '..' means > "parent directory". This is obviously impossible when at the root of > the drive! Of course, it's possile: just make ".." point to the root itself. That's what Unix filesystems do, and that's what the DJGPP library's emulation of "c:/.." does as well. It works so well that I'm guessing no one until now was aware of that.