Message-Id: <200007140956.MAA11876@mailgw1.netvision.net.il>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2000 12:56:36 +0200
To: yosuke AT ccwf DOT cc DOT utexas DOT edu
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.2.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.5b
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
CC: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <8km1bf$kko$1@geraldo.cc.utexas.edu> (yosuke@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu)
Subject: Re: redir.exe question
References: <8kkv0e$4co$1 AT geraldo DOT cc DOT utexas DOT edu> <200007131938 DOT PAA26113 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <8km1bf$kko$1 AT geraldo DOT cc DOT utexas DOT edu>
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: yosuke AT ccwf DOT cc DOT utexas DOT edu ()
> Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
> Date: 14 Jul 2000 03:27:43 GMT
> 
> Actually the out/err comes from dos-batch file which calls
> compilers/linkers.  So I guess I will write a driver c program which uses
> setbuf, then system calls the batch file...  Am I on the right track?

No, you cannot control buffering within other programs (compilers and
linkers, in this case) by calling setvbuf in your driver.

So I don't think you will be able to get stdout and stderr mixed in
their correct chronological order, in your case.  Sorry.