From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Filetree disk size
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 18:58:29 +0100
Organization: Customer of Planet Online
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <396CB1C5.56815648@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1000712181146 DOT 4113E-100000 AT is>
NNTP-Posting-Host: modem-192.calcium.dialup.pol.co.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk 963425225 25446 62.136.19.192 (12 Jul 2000 18:07:05 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: 12 Jul 2000 18:07:05 GMT
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT theplanet DOT net
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.14 i586)
X-Accept-Language: de,fr
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 12 Jul 2000, Hans-Bernhard Broeker wrote:
> 
> > Speaking about 'du':
> >
> > > Unfortunately, it also doesn't take the exact cluster size into
> > > account, so the size it prints is always less than the actual size.
> > >
> > > Perhaps a future port of Fileutils could take care of this.

Well, since I'm in the process of porting fileutils 4.0, we could put this
feature in. Block size is one of the things on my to-do list. I hope to
have an alpha out soon (like today, tomorrow).

Bye,

-- 
Richard Dawe
[ mailto:richdawe AT bigfoot DOT com | http://www.bigfoot.com/~richdawe/ ]