From: Sean Proctor Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: Bits Message-ID: References: <395B6071 DOT 19052 DOT 12454BB AT localhost> <395C9EC4 DOT 31714592 AT pentek DOT com> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.7/32.534 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 25 Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2000 22:51:17 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.16.155.188 X-Complaints-To: Abuse Role , We Care X-Trace: monger.newsread.com 962405477 207.16.155.188 (Fri, 30 Jun 2000 18:51:17 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2000 18:51:17 EDT Organization: ENTER.net (enter.net) To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com On Fri, 30 Jun 2000 09:21:08 -0400, Charles Krug wrote: >Sean Proctor wrote: >> >> well, as I personally know no one that uses a system where a byte is >> not 8 bits, I think it's a pretty safe bet. ;) >> >> Sean > >Sean: > >Nice to meet you. > >Texas Instruments TMS320C4x/C3x family of processors use a 32-bit byte. > > >Charles and as I don't know you personally, I think I'm still pretty safe. =) I'm also pretty sure the person who posted the original message wasn't looking to use it on a machine that wasn't 8-bits... and if he was... then he could simple use a different structure for getting him a data type whose size he knows. Sean