From: Damian Yerrick Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: is it possible to use strip option in call to compiler Organization: Pin Eight Software http://pineight.8m.com/ Message-ID: References: <39573ebd AT dnews DOT tpgi DOT com DOT au> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.7/32.534 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 22 X-Trace: /KtlGUserLWELASruduRD2s37NIK2z+rylJdT3Bop0rOwqsJkufTl3xIFW/zyUShDThdyLM939Vo!BQuYHQBEQ8ICOA6oxCH52nL5A17JPVoWYAtbVeSgmPPVGFzZZZIqVnVmHFawuqmCdAyhqo7CJk0n!ZPe2 X-Complaints-To: abuse AT gte DOT net X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 18:31:24 GMT Distribution: world Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 18:31:24 GMT To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Al wrote: >Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >> Hmm? If you use the -s compiler switch, the produced executable is >> already stripped, so running strip.exe on it should not change its >> size by even a single byte. If this doesn't work for you, it's either >> some usage error or a bug in one of the tools (the linker or >> strip.exe). > >Well I've found that running strip.exe after -s does reduce the >executable size by a smaller fraction. What versions of gcc and binutils are you running? -- Damian Yerrick "I refuse to listen to those who refuse to listen to reason." See the whole sig: http://www.rose-hulman.edu/~yerricde/sig.html This is McAfee VirusScan. Add these two lines to your signature to prevent the spread of signature viruses. http://www.mcafee.com/