Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 19:11:20 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Radical NetSurfer <radsmail AT juno DOT com>
cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Allegro392 NOT HAPPY!
In-Reply-To: <m0melsoth85c48qbomarbt377h7if1pin4@4ax.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000626190937.9333C-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Mon, 26 Jun 2000, Radical NetSurfer wrote:

>  compiling my project in 3.1.2. -->  383,488 bytes
>                                      3.9.2.  --> 610,816
>                        DIFFERENCE:      227,328

Did you strip the executable program?  If not, I suggest to strip it (in 
both cases) and judge the difference only after that.  It's possible that 
the later version of Allegro was compiled by compiler/assembler that 
leave much more debugging info in the code.