X-Originating-Host: 202.137.2.145
Organization: http://www.remarq.com: The World's Usenet/Discussions Start Here
Subject: Re: preprpcessor for overiding gcc optimation switch
Lines: 18
From: batchex <thedark1NOthSPAM AT phreaker DOT net DOT invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Message-ID: <25c58271.fc969396@usw-ex0104-033.remarq.com>
References: <Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 21 DOT 0006030531400 DOT 1081-100000 AT roadrunner DOT grendel DOT net> <83zop3o170 DOT fsf AT mercury DOT bitbucket>
Bytes: 656
X-Wren-Trace: eEBlTUxVElgTFFxNQQFTQgNzQE1XQQFdQF4BTUxAGVIfFE4QHVcbHAIQEBA=
Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2000 13:09:49 -0700
NNTP-Posting-Host: 10.0.2.33
X-Complaints-To: wrenabuse AT remarq DOT com
X-Trace: WReNphoon4 961359116 10.0.2.33 (Sun, 18 Jun 2000 13:11:56 PDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2000 13:11:56 PDT
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Hi,

The reason I'm asking this cause in one of my project, one (only
one) of the source file, when compiled with optimation, then try
to debug a function contained in that file in gdb, it will give
errorneous results. I forgot if gdb crashed while debugging it
or not, but I remember peculiar flow of my program. It is solved
if that particular source file is compiled without optimation. I
have tried it with gcc 2.8.1 & 2.9.5, also with pgcc 2.90.23.

Hmm, looks like I have to add a new rule in the makefile after
all.

Thanks guys.

Got questions?  Get answers over the phone at Keen.com.
Up to 100 minutes free!
http://www.keen.com