Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2000 09:30:14 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Richard Dawe <richdawe AT bigfoot DOT com>
cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Inline asm: lcall & various binutils versions
In-Reply-To: <39357EF3.68F1A575@bigfoot.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000601092740.17554F-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Wed, 31 May 2000, Richard Dawe wrote:

> BTW the __dpmi_paddr structure isn't padded. None of the structures in
> dpmi.h seem to be. I wonder if they should be, perhaps for DJGPP 2.04?

What for?  What are the problems with them being unpadded?

(Btw, nothing prevents the compiler from padding them at will, and I 
think it actually will do that.  Did you look at sizeof(__dpmi_paddr)?)