To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: C++, complex, etc
References: <0rneisomj48fm3khdpdodsilqpndjqd7do AT 4ax DOT com> <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1000522093304 DOT 22890H-100000 AT is> <1osjis87hetlomjooiv6prc0iev46cncdt AT 4ax DOT com> <200005230314 DOT XAA01009 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
From: Esa A E Peuha <peuha AT cc DOT helsinki DOT fi>
Date: 23 May 2000 11:01:27 +0300
In-Reply-To: DJ Delorie's message of "Mon, 22 May 2000 23:14:15 -0400"
Message-ID: <86pbt1xbsq0.fsf@sirppi.helsinki.fi>
Lines: 14
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.6.43/Emacs 19.34
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> writes:

> Imaging ssize_t being 8 bits.  Values are 0..255.

Since ssize_t is signed, the values should be -128..127.

BTW, why is djgpp's size_t typedef'd as long unsigned int while
ssize_t is just int?  Of course it doesn't really matter as long as
long and int are both 32 bits, but it doesn't look very pedantic ;-)

-- 
Esa Peuha
student of mathematics at the University of Helsinki
http://www.helsinki.fi/~peuha/