Message-ID: <3923CD97.8818A800@mtu-net.ru>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 15:01:43 +0400
From: "Alexei A. Frounze" <alex DOT fru AT mtu-net DOT ru>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win95; I)
X-Accept-Language: ru,en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: C++, complex, etc
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1000518141100 DOT 13603B-100000 AT is>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Recipient: eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 18 May 2000, Alexei A. Frounze wrote:
> 
> > So do we already have that standard, right?
> 
> Yes.
> 
> > Where can I find specs
> 
> ANSI and ISO sell it for some money.

Something like a compiler is a very cool thing and you may have it
absolutely for free. But you can't use because you have no docs. Docs cost
some bucks. ;))

Free cheese exisits only in traps. ;))

Why not to do the opposite thing? Free specs and commercial
compilers/libraries. :))

> No, I understand that from other people who posted here.  I myself don't
> care much about C++.

Right now, me too. I just found that stupid incompatibility because I needed
some complex math in my project. >:[]

bye.
Alexei A. Frounze
-----------------------------------------
Homepage: http://alexfru.chat.ru
Mirror:   http://members.xoom.com/alexfru