Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 14:14:06 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: "Alexei A. Frounze" <alex DOT fru AT mtu-net DOT ru>
cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: C++, complex, etc
In-Reply-To: <3923B90D.22A6AEBC@mtu-net.ru>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000518141100.13603B-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Thu, 18 May 2000, Alexei A. Frounze wrote:

> So do we already have that standard, right?

Yes.

> Where can I find specs

ANSI and ISO sell it for some money.

> and a compiler that supports it?

AFAIK, no compiler/library are currently 100% complying.  MSVC and GCC 
come close, though.  Rumor has it that the next release 3.0 of libstdc++ 
will implement the entire Standard C++ library.

> > I understand that it tells what the other people said in this thread:
> > that you need to use "complex<double>" etc.
> 
> You understand. That's good. But does that mean you saw the specs?

No, I understand that from other people who posted here.  I myself don't 
care much about C++.