Sender: root AT delorie DOT com Message-ID: <3922B36A.18BB8874@inti.gov.ar> Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 11:57:46 -0300 From: salvador Organization: INTI X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.0.38 i686) X-Accept-Language: es-AR, en, es MIME-Version: 1.0 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: Sun RPC for djgpp? References: <39201D5E DOT 595121FB AT inti DOT gov DOT ar> <39203E55 DOT F221A9C8 AT bigfoot DOT com> <392188E3 DOT 1D56D2F0 AT inti DOT gov DOT ar> <3921AFB9 DOT FD71F12 AT bigfoot DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Richard Dawe wrote: > > Gisle Vanem ported the client stuff to WATTCP. It uses packetdrivers and > > I'll run the client in Win9x boxes so I don't think I'll be able to use > > it. > > You can get an NDIS-to-packet driver shim, called NDISPKT (I think). I > tried this once, but I couldn't get it to work. Gisle Vanem has mentioned > it on the Watt-32 mailing list, so I guess it works and I just have no > idea how to set it up properly. ;) Gisle sent me a link, I'll test it as soon as I can. > > BTW: libsocket seems to define some RPC structure in the headers, why? I > > think it makes collisions with some RPC header. > > Good question. I think they were there when I took over maintainership of > libsocket. Which RPC structures do you mean? I can remove them for > libsocket 0.7.4 beta 4. I think that's rpcent, it makes collisions with some rpc header. I saw it when I did a silly test to see if I could compile the wattcp code using libsocket ;-) SET -- Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET). (Electronics Engineer) Visit my home page: http://welcome.to/SetSoft or http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Vista/6552/ Alternative e-mail: set-soft AT usa DOT net set AT computer DOT org set AT ieee DOT org set-soft AT bigfoot DOT com Address: Curapaligue 2124, Caseros, 3 de Febrero Buenos Aires, (1678), ARGENTINA Phone: +(5411) 4759 0013