Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 10:16:31 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Tim Updegrove <tdu AT enter DOT net>
cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Algorithm for integer timing loop
In-Reply-To: <391da3c3.14389608@news.enter.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000514101445.26827I-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Sat, 13 May 2000, Tim Updegrove wrote:

> I'm still having negative values (upper 16 bits out of 32 bits become
> 0xffff) with uclock() in Windows 98 SE using version 2.03.

Please post a short test program that exhibits this problem, the command 
lines used to compile it and run it, anbd its output on your system.