Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 09:28:25 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <200005111328.JAA13167@indy.delorie.com>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT delorie DOT com>
To: Adam Majer <ummajera AT cc DOT UManitoba DOT CA>
CC: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: 
	<Pine DOT GS4 DOT 4 DOT 02A DOT 10005100950080 DOT 16755-100000 AT antares DOT cc DOT umanitoba DOT ca>
	(message from Adam Majer on Wed, 10 May 2000 09:50:57 -0500)
Subject: Re: __dpmi_paddr and DJGPP pointers
References: <034f2f50 DOT 765f03be AT usw-ex0108-062 DOT remarq DOT com> <6P8S4.14998$55 DOT 285097 AT news2 DOT rdc1 DOT on DOT home DOT com> <Pine DOT GS4 DOT 4 DOT 02A DOT 10005100950080 DOT 16755-100000 AT antares DOT cc DOT umanitoba DOT ca>
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

> From: Adam Majer <ummajera AT cc DOT UManitoba DOT CA>
> Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
> Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 09:50:57 -0500
>
> But I guess DJGPP doesn't suport far pointer... DARN! :)

That's funny: most people have the opposite complaint: that DJGPP
doesn't support a 100%-flat memory model.

Perhaps if you describe the situation where you need 48-bit far
pointers, someone could suggest an easier way of achieving the same
goal.