From: Richard Dawe <richdawe AT bigfoot DOT com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: structures size
Date: Fri, 05 May 2000 18:39:26 +0100
Organization: Customer of Planet Online
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <3913074E.9405129F@bigfoot.com>
References: <Pine DOT A41 DOT 4 DOT 05 DOT 10005041827250 DOT 48816-100000 AT ieva05 DOT lanet DOT lv> <3911D576 DOT 947D53CF AT mtu-net DOT ru>
NNTP-Posting-Host: modem-143.silicon.dialup.pol.co.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: news8.svr.pol.co.uk 957548536 13100 62.136.13.143 (5 May 2000 17:42:16 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: 5 May 2000 17:42:16 GMT
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT theplanet DOT net
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.14 i586)
X-Accept-Language: de,fr
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

"Alexei A. Frounze" wrote:
> Btw, isn't the following better than yours:
> 
> ----------8<----------
> #pragma pack (push, 1)
> 
> // structure definitions
> 
> #pragma pack (pop)
> ----------8<----------

Is it better because you can nest packing pragmas this way?

Bye,

-- 
Richard Dawe
richdawe AT bigfoot DOT com ICQ 47595498 http://www.bigfoot.com/~richdawe/