From: "Alexei A. Frounze" <alex DOT fru AT mtu-net DOT ru>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: 3rd Try: Maybe an asm problem? (Problems linking)
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2000 13:18:19 +0400
Organization: MTU-Intel ISP
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <390BFA5B.F749B652@mtu-net.ru>
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1000430084510 DOT 27839B-100000 AT is>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp101-40.dialup.mtu-net.ru
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: gavrilo.mtu.ru 957086829 32284 212.188.101.40 (30 Apr 2000 09:27:09 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse AT mtu DOT ru
NNTP-Posting-Date: 30 Apr 2000 09:27:09 GMT
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win95; I)
X-Accept-Language: en,ru
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> No, int86 issues the INT nn instruction in protected mode.

But the result is still the same. DOS Extender or hosting OS switches modes or
emulates direct INTs, if it is capable to do that. :)

bye.
Alexei A. Frounze
-----------------------------------------
Homepage: http://alexfru.chat.ru
Mirror:   http://members.xoom.com/alexfru