From: Hans-Bernhard Broeker <broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: attribute stdcall
Date: 26 Apr 2000 10:08:41 GMT
Organization: Aachen University of Technology (RWTH)
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <8e6f79$99u$1@nets3.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE>
References: <8AyN4.3395$fv3 DOT 5373032 AT nnrp6 DOT proxad DOT net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: acp3bf.physik.rwth-aachen.de
X-Trace: nets3.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE 956743721 9534 137.226.32.75 (26 Apr 2000 10:08:41 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT rwth-aachen DOT de
NNTP-Posting-Date: 26 Apr 2000 10:08:41 GMT
Originator: broeker@
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Alexandre Devaure <Alexandre DOT Devaure AT leroy-autom DOT com> wrote:
> Has sombody ever had compilation problem with a function declared with the
> attribute stdcall with gcc 2.95?

I've never used anything of this, but from looking at the error
messages you show, I'd try adding the __attribute((stdcall)) to the
function implementation. That attribute becomes part of the 'type' of
the function, so it's no big surprise that the compiler complains if
the implementation doesn't use the exact same type as the prototype
declaration.



-- 
Hans-Bernhard Broeker (broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de)
Even if all the snow were burnt, ashes would remain.